Ex vivo evaluation of a percutaneous thread-transecting technique for desmotomy of normal palmar/plantar annular ligaments in horses.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and describe a minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided, percutaneous technique for the desmotomy of equine palmar/plantar annular ligaments (PALs) using a transecting thread. STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Twenty-one normal equine distal limb specimens. METHODS: Under ultrasonographic guidance, a surgical thread was percutaneously placed around the PAL through 2 skin punctures (proximal and distal) using a 18 gauge spinal needle in equine limbs (11 forelimbs, 10 hindlimbs) with normal PALs. The ligament was transected by a back-and-forth motion of the thread until the loop emerged from the proximal skin puncture site. Each specimen was dissected and assessed for completeness of transection and iatrogenic damage under direct visualization. Descriptive statistics were reported. RESULTS: The PAL was completely transected in 17/21 limbs. The mean duration of the procedure was 16 minutes. Superficial needle puncture or subtle abrasion of the superficial digital flexor tendon was noticed in 4 limbs. No iatrogenic injury to other intrathecal structures was identified. After PAL division, the needle entry and exit points had a mean diameter of 1.2 and 1 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Desmotomy of normal PALs in equine limb specimens was performed effectively using the percutaneous thread-transecting technique with minimal iatrogenic damage to adjacent structures. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Information from this study will allow refinement of the technique for use in equine clinical cases either in standing or anesthetized horses.

The Modified Ultrasound-Guided Distal-to-Proximal Carpal Tunnel Injection With Median Nerve Hydrodissection: A Retrospective Safety Review of 827 Procedures.

Objective: The aim of this report is to describe a new ultrasound guided technique for carpal tunnel injection and median nerve hydrodissection using distal to proximal approach. Methods: From 2015 to 2019, 827 consecutive injections by distal-to-proximal approach were included using coding information to check for post-procedural skin hypopigmentation, hematoma, seroma, nerve injury, or vascular injury. Results: There were no occurrences of post-procedural skin-hypopigmentation, hematoma or seroma formation, or neurovascular injury. Conclusions: The distal approach carpal tunnel injection is a safe and effective method. It may directly inject the medication into carpal tunnel to avoid skin hypopigmentation from steroid side effect with previous report method, also it may release adhesion of median nerve with surrounding soft tissue by hydrodissection. It helps median nerve compression at outlet of carpal tunnel.

Ultrasound Measurements of the First Extensor Compartment: Determining the Transection Limits for Ultra-minimally Invasive Release of De Quervain Tenosynovitis.

Background: De Quervain syndrome is the second most common compressive tendinopathy. Although the length of the first extensor compartment (FEC) has been studied previously, there is no documented reported comparison study of short-axis and long-axis sonographic measurements. The thread technique, or Guo Technique, has been applied to carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger, and superficial peroneal compressive neuropathy. To perform this procedure, it is critically important to accurately identify the boundaries for transection. Methods: Twenty-one fresh frozen cadaver upper extremities were examined under ultrasound to determine the length of the extensor retinaculum (ER) over the FEC. Using the sonographic landmarks, the ERs were measured in short axis and long axis over their proximal to distal margins and from the distal margins to the distal edges of the radial styloids. These sonographic measurements were then compared with gross anatomical measurements. Results: The short-axis sonographic measurement of the ER on average was 22.53 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] = 20.79-24.05 mm). The long-axis sonographic measurement of the ER on average was 15.65 mm (95% CI = 13.70-17.78 mm). The average length of the ER by gross anatomical dissection was 22.40 mm (95% CI = 21.15-23.51 mm). Conclusions: The short axis is not significantly different from the gross anatomical measurement; however, the long axis is significantly lower than the gross anatomical measurement. The results support the idea that the short axis is more accurate than the long axis.

Thread common peroneal nerve release-a cadaveric validation study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the thread release technique can be applied to common peroneal nerve entrapment at the fibular neck. METHODS: The thread common peroneal nerve release was performed on 15 fresh frozen cadaveric lower extremity specimens. All procedures were performed under ultrasound guidance and immediately underwent post-procedural gross anatomic inspection for completeness of decompression and presence or absence of iatrogenic neurovascular injury. RESULTS: All 15 specimens demonstrated complete transection of the deep fascia of the peroneus longus overlying the common peroneal nerve. The transections extended to the bifurcation of the superficial peroneal and deep peroneal nerves. There was no evidence of any iatrogenic damage to the neurovascular bundle or adjacent tendons. The average operating time was less than 30 min. CONCLUSION: This cadaveric validation study demonstrates the accuracy of the thread common peroneal nerve release. Future pilot studies are warranted to ensure the safety of this procedure in the clinical setting.

Percutaneous cubital tunnel release with a dissection thread: a cadaveric study.

This cadaveric study tested the feasibility of decompressing the ulnar nerve across the elbow percutaneously with a commercially available surgical dissection thread, a guiding needle, hydrodissection and ultrasound guidance. We performed the procedure in 19 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities. Subsequently, we did an anatomical dissection of the specimens to visualize the extent of ulnar nerve decompression and the extent of damage to surrounding structures. The cubital tunnel and deep across the medial elbow were completely transected leaving the ulnar nerve fully decompressed in all cases. There was no evidence of direct injury to the ulnar nerve or adjacent neurovascular structures. A prerequisite knowledge of sonographic anatomy and experience with interventional ultrasound is essential. Future clinical studies should evaluate this technique's safety and efficacy compared with conventional ones.

A cadaveric study using the ultra-minimally invasive thread transection technique to decompress the superficial peroneal nerve in the lower leg.

BACKGROUND: After successful applications of the ultra-minimally invasive thread transecting technique (Guo Technique) for both thread carpal tunnel release and thread trigger finger release, we hypothesized that this technique could be used for superficial peroneal nerve release in the lower leg by selective crural fasciectomy. This study is aimed at testing the operative feasibility of performing the thread superficial peroneal nerve release (TSPNR) procedure in cadavers. METHODS: The TSPNR procedure was performed on 15 fresh frozen cadaveric lower-extremity specimens under ultrasound guidance. All cadaveric specimens were dissected and visually assessed immediately after the procedures. RESULTS: All 15 legs demonstrated a complete transection of the crural fasciae along the course of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) including where it penetrated and traversed the crural fascia. There was no evidence of any iatrogenic damage to the neurovascular bundle or adjacent tendons. The average operating time was less than 20 min. CONCLUSION: This cadaveric study demonstrated that the technique of TSPNR was accurate, reliable, and feasible while causing no injury to adjacent neurovascular structures and avoiding having to make a skin incision. Further studies are warranted to verify the results of this study before implementing this new technique in the clinical setting.

Minimally invasive thread trigger digit release: a preliminary report on 34 digits of the adult hands.

The trigger finger release was performed in 34 digits (11 thumbs and 23 fingers) of 24 patients through the thread transecting technique with the tip-to-tip approach, in which a 22-gauge needle inserts into a 18-gauge needle when both needles are inside the hand, guiding the 22-gauge needle to exit the hand at the same access point of 18-gauge needle. We prospectively evaluated the effectiveness and functional recovery of these patients. In all 34 digits, triggering and locking were resolved, and complete extension and flexion occurred immediately following the release. There were no complications, such as incomplete release, neurovascular or flexor tendon or A2 pulley injury, infection, or tendon bow-stringing. Patients did not require prescription pain medications. Most patients used their hands to meet their basic living needs the same day of the procedure. The hand function evaluated with the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, and scored 4 within 3 months. Level of evidence: II.

A Cadaveric Study of the Thread Trigger Finger Release: The First Annular Pulley Transection Through Thread Transecting Technique.

BACKGROUND: After the thread transecting technique was successfully applied for the thread carpal tunnel release, we researched using the same technique in the thread trigger finger release (TTFR). This study was designed to test the operational feasibility of the TTFR on cadavers and verify the limits of division on the first annular (A1) pulley to ensure a complete trigger finger release with minimal iatrogenic injuries. METHODS: The procedure of TTFR was performed on 14 fingers and 4 thumbs of 4 unembalmed cadaveric hands. After the procedures, all fingers and thumbs were dissected and visually assessed. RESULTS: All of the digits and thumbs demonstrated a complete A1 pulley release. There was no injury to the neurovascular bundle (radial digital nerve in case of thumb), flexor tendon, or A2 pulley for each case. CONCLUSIONS: The cadaveric study showed that the technique of TTFR was safe and effective, and the future clinical study is necessary to verify the findings of this study.

A Clinical Study of the Modified Thread Carpal Tunnel Release.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that the thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) is a safe and effective technique. Through a study on 11 cadaveric wrists, the TCTR procedure was modified and the needle control accuracy was improved to 0.15 to 0.2 mm, which is precise enough to preserve superficial palmar aponeurosis (SupPA), Berrettini branch, and common digital nerves. The aim of the present study was to verify the modified TCTR clinically. METHODS: The modified TCTR was performed on 159 hands of 116 patients. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire was used for assessing the outcomes. Statistical analyses were used to compare the outcomes with the available data from the literature for the open and endoscopic techniques. RESULTS: TCTR led to significant improvement in the short-term results, and the outcomes were better in long-term results compared with the open or endoscopic release. The SupPA, Berrettini branch, and common digital nerves were protected. There was no neurovascular complication for any case. Significant relief of symptoms was observed 3 to 5 hours post procedure. Most patients used their hands on the day of the procedure for simple daily activity. Patients reported their sleep quality was improved on the surgical day. Most patients with office jobs were able to return to work on postoperative day 1, and those with repetitive jobs returned to work in about 2 weeks. The statistical evidence proves that the modified TCTR procedure results in improved clinical outcomes as compared with open carpal tunnel release (CTR) and endoscopic CTR. CONCLUSIONS: The TCTR procedure has been shown to be a safe and effective technique for CTR. The modified TCTR procedure minimizes postoperative complications, such as pillar pain, scar tenderness, or functional weakness, by avoiding unnecessary injuries to the surrounding structures around the transverse carpal ligament during the procedure.

An update on addressing important peripheral nerve problems: challenges and potential solutions.

From time to time it is thoughtful and productive to review a medical field and reflect upon what are the major issues that need to be addressed and what is being done to do so. This review article is not meant to be all-inclusive but rather focuses on four evolving areas in the field of peripheral nerve disorders and treatments: (1) nerve surgery under ultrasound guidance using a new ultra-minimally invasive thread technique; (2) evolving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound imaging techniques that are helping to both diagnose and treat a variety of peripheral nerve problems including entrapment neuropathies, traumatic nerve injuries, and masses arising from nerves; (3) promoting recovery after nerve injury using electrical stimulation; and (4) developing animal models to reproduce a severe nerve injury (neurotmetic grade in continuity) that requires a surgical intervention and repair. In each area we first describe the current challenges and then discuss new and emerging techniques and approaches. It is our hope that this article will bring added attention and resources to help better address peripheral nerve problems that remain a challenge for both patients and physicians.

A Cadaveric Study for the Improvement of Thread Carpal Tunnel Release.

PURPOSE: The thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) technique has been improved and offers more precise control in dissecting thread placement. The purpose of this cadaveric study was to test the procedure operationally and verify the modified TCTR anatomically. METHODS: Eleven unembalmed cadaver wrists underwent the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) release by using the modified TCTR technique. An experienced observer dissected each specimen and assessed for completeness of release under direct visual assessment. Injury to the superficial palmar aponeurosis (SupPA), the Berrettini and common digital nerve branches were also recorded as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Eleven out of 11 wrists (100%) underwent the modified TCTR with complete release of the TCL. All 11 wrists were released without damage to any vital neurovascular structure including the Berrettini branch and the common digital nerves. The SupPA remained intact in all 5 wrists performed with the preservation steps. CONCLUSIONS: The modified TCTR technique demonstrated complete division of the TCL while protecting the SupPA as well as the Berrettini and common digital nerve branches. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The modified TCTR has the potential to offer a clinically safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for complete carpal tunnel release.

A non-scalpel technique for minimally invasive surgery: percutaneously looped thread transection of the transverse carpal ligament.

PURPOSE: This study aims to develop an alternate technique for improving the surgical procedure of carpal tunnel release. METHOD: The transverse carpal ligament is transected by utilizing a piece of thread looped percutaneously under the visualization of ultrasound. The procedure, the thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR), was performed on 34 hands of 20 patients. Self-administrated Levine-Katz questionnaire was used for assessing the symptom severity and functional status of the outcomes. RESULTS: TCTR was performed in each case with no unintended consequences. The average duration for a procedure was 7 min, excluding time of preparation. Significant improvements in subjective sensibility were reported within 24 h, and sleep quality improved for all cases. There were no postoperative complications. The scores of questionnaire 3 months postoperatively were comparable to the literature controls. CONCLUSION: TCTR is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgery performed under local anesthesia in a clinic-based procedure room and results in only one-needle entrance point at the wrist and one-needle exit point in the palm. The feature of the procedure includes the potentials of reduced risk of iatrogenic injury, reduced surgical cost, and reduced patient recovery time. The study has shown encouraging promise for optimizing the technique of carpal tunnel release, and more clinical trials are necessary to confirm the findings.